Open / Close Advertisement

Steel Institute Testifies to China's Failed WTO Compliance

Outlining the detriment to the U.S. steel industry and manufacturing sector caused by unfair trade practices, Dempsey urged the U.S. government to adopt a more aggressive strategy in addressing China’s trade-distorting practices.
 
“The current U.S.-China trading relationship is taking a tremendous toll on U.S. manufacturers – millions of jobs have been lost, thousands of U.S. factories have been shuttered and the American steel industry has been severely disrupted,” testified Dempsey. “The U.S. needs to take much bolder and imaginative steps to address this chronic problem.
 
“The fact that China has not fully complied with its WTO obligations underscores the importance of effective enforcement of U.S. trade remedy laws. The U.S. should continue to treat China as a non-market economy for purposes of the U.S. antidumping laws, ensure that Chinese companies are not circumventing or evading U.S. antidumping and countervailing duties and take strong actions to address attempts by China to gain unfair advantage in trade remedy proceedings by hacking the computer systems of domestic producers in the U.S.,” Dempsey continued.
 
Click here for full testimony which highlights the overall comments submitted to the TPSC on 17 September 2014.
 
Dempsey’s testimony focused on a number of China’s trade violations including: 
  • Massive government subsidies to the Chinese steel industry, while the government manipulates its value-added tax system to manage and promote exports of its steel products. 
  • Heavy control over state owned enterprises (SOEs), despite China’s pledge – as part of its WTO accession -- that it would not “influence” commercial decisions.
  • Numerous measures to inappropriately aid its steel producers in securing access to raw materials and manipulate raw material prices that give Chinese producers an unfair advantage over U.S. producers.
  • Keeping the value of its currency at artificially-low levels that gives Chinese manufacturers an unfair advantage in the U.S. and third country markets.
  • Effective enforcement of intellectual property rights has still not been achieved in China and infringements remain a serious concern.  
Dempsey concluded, “The U.S. steel industry can compete with any industry in the world, but we cannot compete with governments. China has used massive subsidies and other trade-distorting measures that are in violation of its WTO obligations to provide an unfair advantage to its steel industry. The U.S. government must fundamentally alter its approach to encourage China to end its trade-distorting practices and comply with all of its WTO obligations.”